Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Nov 09, 2015
    • Ganesh Ajjanagadde's avatar
      swresample/resample: improve bessel function accuracy and speed · a5202bc9
      Ganesh Ajjanagadde authored
      This improves accuracy for the bessel function at large arguments, and this in turn
      should improve the quality of the Kaiser window. It also improves the
      performance of the bessel function and hence build_filter by ~ 20%.
      Details are given below.
      
      Algorithm: taken from the Boost project, who have done a detailed
      investigation of the accuracy of their method, as compared with e.g the
      GNU Scientific Library (GSL):
      http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/libs/math/doc/sf_and_dist/html/math_toolkit/special/bessel/mbessel.html.
      Boost source code (also cited and licensed in the code):
      https://searchcode.com/codesearch/view/14918379/
      
      .
      
      Accuracy: sample values may be obtained as follows. i0 denotes the old bessel code,
      i0_boost the approach here, and i0_real an arbitrary precision result (truncated) from Wolfram Alpha:
      type "bessel i0(6.0)" to reproduce. These are evaluation points that occur for
      the default kaiser_beta = 9.
      
      Some illustrations:
      bessel(8.0)
      i0      (8.000000) = 427.564115721804739678191254
      i0_boost(8.000000) = 427.564115721804796521610115
      i0_real (8.000000) = 427.564115721804785177396791
      
      bessel(6.0)
      i0      (6.000000) = 67.234406976477956163762428
      i0_boost(6.000000) = 67.234406976477970374617144
      i0_real (6.000000) = 67.234406976477975326188025
      
      Reason for accuracy: Main accuracy benefits come at larger bessel arguments, where the
      Taylor-Maclaurin method is not that good: 23+ iterations
      (at large arguments, since the series is about 0) can cause
      significant floating point error accumulation.
      
      Benchmarks: Obtained on x86-64, Haswell, GNU/Linux via a loop calling
      build_filter 1000 times:
      test: fate-swr-resample-dblp-44100-2626
      
      new:
      995894468 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     256 runs,      0 skips
      1029719302 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     512 runs,      0 skips
      984101131 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),    1024 runs,      0 skips
      
      old:
      1250020763 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     256 runs,      0 skips
      1246353282 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     512 runs,      0 skips
      1220017565 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),    1024 runs,      0 skips
      
      A further ~ 5% may be squeezed by enabling -ftree-vectorize. However,
      this is a separate issue from this patch.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarMichael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGanesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
      a5202bc9
    • Ganesh Ajjanagadde's avatar
      swresample: allow double precision beta value for the Kaiser window · 1bed09a3
      Ganesh Ajjanagadde authored
      
      Kaiser windows inherently don't require beta to be an integer. This was
      an arbitrary restriction. Moreover, soxr does not require it, and in
      fact often estimates beta to a non-integral value.
      
      Thus, this patch allows greater flexibility for swresample clients.
      Micro version is updated.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarDerek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarMichael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGanesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
      1bed09a3
  2. Nov 06, 2015
    • Ganesh Ajjanagadde's avatar
      swresample/resample: speed up build_filter for Blackman-Nuttall filter · c8780822
      Ganesh Ajjanagadde authored
      
      This uses the trigonometric double and triple angle formulae to avoid
      repeated (expensive) evaluation of libc's cos().
      
      Sample benchmark (x86-64, Haswell, GNU/Linux)
      test: fate-swr-resample-dblp-44100-2626
      old:
      1104466600 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     256 runs,      0 skips
      1096765286 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     512 runs,      0 skips
      1070479590 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),    1024 runs,      0 skips
      
      new:
      588861423 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     256 runs,      0 skips
      591262754 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     512 runs,      0 skips
      577355145 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),    1024 runs,      0 skips
      
      This results in small differences with the old expression:
      difference (worst case on [0, 2*M_PI]), argmax 0.008:
      max diff (relative): 0.000000000000157289807188
      blackman_old(0.008): 0.000363951585488813192382
      blackman_new(0.008): 0.000363951585488755946507
      
      These are judged to be insignificant for the performance gain. PSNR to
      reference file is unchanged up to second decimal point for instance.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarMichael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGanesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
      c8780822
  3. Nov 04, 2015
    • Ganesh Ajjanagadde's avatar
      swresample/resample: speed up build_filter by 50% · 9bec6d71
      Ganesh Ajjanagadde authored
      
      This speeds up build_filter by ~ 50%. This gain should be pretty
      consistent across all architectures and platforms.
      
      Essentially, this relies on a observation that the filters have some
      even/odd symmetry that may be exploited during the construction of the
      polyphase filter bank. In particular, phases (scaled to [0, 1]) in [0.5, 1] are
      easily derived from [0, 0.5] and expensive reevaluation of function
      points are unnecessary. This requires some rather annoying even/odd
      bookkeeping as can be seen from the patch.
      
      I vaguely recall from signal processing theory more general symmetries allowing even greater
      optimization of the construction. At a high level, "even functions"
      correspond to 2, and one can imagine variations. Nevertheless, for the sake
      of some generality and because of existing filters, this is all that is
      being exploited.
      
      Currently, this patch relies on phase_count being even or (trivially) 1,
      though this is not an inherent limitation to the approach. This
      assumption is safe as phase_count is 1 << phase_bits, and is hence a
      power of two. There is no way for user API to set it to a nontrivial odd
      number. This assumption has been placed as an assert in the code.
      
      To repeat, this assumes even symmetry of the filters, which is the most common
      way to get generalized linear phase anyway and is true of all currently
      supported filters.
      
      As a side note, accuracy should be identical or perhaps slightly better
      due to this "forcing" filter symmetries leading to a better phase
      characteristic. As before, I can't test this claim easily, though it may
      be of interest.
      
      Patch tested with FATE.
      
      Sample benchmark (x86-64, Haswell, GNU/Linux):
      
      test: swr-resample-dblp-44100-2626
      
      new:
      527376779 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     256 runs,      0 skips
      524361765 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     512 runs,      0 skips
      516552574 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),    1024 runs,      0 skips
      
      old:
      974178658 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     256 runs,      0 skips
      972794408 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),     512 runs,      0 skips
      954350046 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000),    1024 runs,      0 skips
      
      Note that lower level optimizations are entirely possible, I focussed on
      getting the high level semantics correct. In any case, this should
      provide a good foundation.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarMichael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGanesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
      9bec6d71
  4. Oct 28, 2015
  5. Oct 25, 2015
  6. Oct 22, 2015
    • Ganesh Ajjanagadde's avatar
      avfilter,swresample,swscale: use fabs, fabsf instead of FFABS · 8507b98c
      Ganesh Ajjanagadde authored
      It is well known that fabs and fabsf are at least as fast and sometimes
      faster than the FFABS macro, at least on the gcc+glibc combination.
      For instance, see the reference:
      http://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/6735/
      
      .
      This was a patch to glibc in order to remove their usages of a macro.
      
      The reason essentially boils down to fabs using the __builtin_fabs of
      the compiler, while FFABS needs to infer to not use a branch and to
      simply change the sign bit. Usually the inference works, but sometimes
      it does not. This may be easily checked by looking at the asm.
      
      This also has the added benefit of reducing macro usage, which has
      problems with side-effects.
      
      Note that avcodec is not handled here, as it is huge and
      most things there are integer arithmetic anyway.
      
      Tested with FATE.
      
      Reviewed-by: default avatarClément Bœsch <u@pkh.me>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGanesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>
      8507b98c
  7. Oct 16, 2015
  8. Oct 15, 2015
  9. Oct 10, 2015
  10. Oct 07, 2015
  11. Oct 02, 2015
  12. Sep 27, 2015
  13. Sep 03, 2015
  14. Aug 30, 2015
  15. Aug 23, 2015
  16. Aug 03, 2015
  17. Jul 26, 2015
  18. Jul 16, 2015
  19. Jun 22, 2015
  20. Jun 21, 2015
  21. Jun 08, 2015
  22. Jun 06, 2015
  23. Jun 04, 2015
  24. Jun 03, 2015
  25. Jun 02, 2015
  26. May 31, 2015
  27. May 13, 2015
  28. May 06, 2015
  29. Apr 12, 2015
Loading