Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Aug 19, 2008
  2. Aug 08, 2008
  3. Aug 05, 2008
  4. Jul 24, 2008
  5. Jul 13, 2008
  6. Jun 13, 2008
  7. Apr 25, 2008
  8. Apr 21, 2008
  9. Mar 07, 2008
  10. Mar 06, 2008
  11. Mar 05, 2008
  12. Feb 25, 2008
  13. Feb 03, 2008
  14. Jan 28, 2008
  15. Dec 03, 2007
  16. Nov 06, 2007
  17. Nov 05, 2007
  18. Sep 11, 2007
  19. Sep 09, 2007
  20. Sep 08, 2007
    • Michael Niedermayer's avatar
      store halfpel filter coefficients in the header as well as the · 7d7f57d9
      Michael Niedermayer authored
      flag for diagonal interpolation
      
      the primary reason for this change is that previously MC up to 1/4 pel
      matched H.264 exactly and that increases the risk of stumbling over
      patents
      
      secondly this allows 0.10 db or more quality gain by choosing a longer
      filter and the filter could also be chosen optimally for each frame
      though that of course would cause speed loss at the decoder and encoder
      side ...
      
      Originally committed as revision 10436 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
      7d7f57d9
    • Michael Niedermayer's avatar
      cleanup mc_block() · a68ca08e
      Michael Niedermayer authored
      perform interpolation steps in such an order that halfpel interpolation
      could be done per picture
      this also makes mc_block() match h.264 for the 1/4 pel cases so that the
      use of the h264 functions for some cases does not introduce a fantastic mess
      
      Originally committed as revision 10433 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
      a68ca08e
  21. Aug 25, 2007
  22. Aug 23, 2007
  23. Aug 21, 2007
  24. Aug 05, 2007
  25. Aug 04, 2007
  26. Jul 03, 2007
  27. Jun 07, 2007
  28. Mar 24, 2007
    • Michael Niedermayer's avatar
      1000000l for me ive misstakely reverted the regression checksum change from r8444 in r8486 · 1c87ed3a
      Michael Niedermayer authored
      how did i succeed doing such a ridiculously silly thing? well i think it happened like:
      1. verifying that the regression tests pass with old resample2.c
      2. updating the regressions to the new resample2.c ... failed svn complained
      3. svn up
      4. updating the regressions to the new resample2.c success (r8485)
      
      at that point everything was still ok
      
      5. some more resample2.c work update regressions, read diff, commit (r8486)
      
      my misstake was that the svn up at point 3 was run in tests/  -> iam an idiot
      
      Originally committed as revision 8489 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
      1c87ed3a
  29. Mar 22, 2007
  30. Mar 18, 2007
  31. Mar 05, 2007
  32. Feb 12, 2007
Loading