From cf7f2b16ddb66c82e09f915ffcb4fe645d0d36c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:22:01 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] note about our speed with replying to patches

Originally committed as revision 3442 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
---
 doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
index 5241c28fda7..e554ead8b53 100644
--- a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
+++ b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
@@ -1047,6 +1047,9 @@ It also helps quite a bit if you tell us what the patch does (for example
 'replaces lrint by lrintf') , and why (for example '*bsd isnt c99 compliant
 and has no lrint()')
 
+We reply to all patches submitted and either apply or reject with some
+explanation why, but sometimes we are quite busy so it can take a week or 2
+
 @section Regression tests
 
 Before submitting a patch (or committing with CVS), you should at least
-- 
GitLab